From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillard v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Dec 4, 2006
1:06CV00330, 1:04CR411-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006)

Opinion

1:06CV00330, 1:04CR411-1.

December 4, 2006


O-R-D-E-R


On September 26, 2006, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in this action and a copy was given to the court.

Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Petitioner objected to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Pleading no. 1] be DENIED and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued.


Summaries of

Dillard v. U.S.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Dec 4, 2006
1:06CV00330, 1:04CR411-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Dillard v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES NATHANIEL DILLARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Dec 4, 2006

Citations

1:06CV00330, 1:04CR411-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006)