From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dillard v. Daniels

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 15, 2006
Civil No. 05-932-TC (D. Or. Aug. 15, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-932-TC.

August 15, 2006


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 26, 2006. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. Petitioner's claim for relief is denied as moot. This proceeding is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dillard v. Daniels

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 15, 2006
Civil No. 05-932-TC (D. Or. Aug. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Dillard v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS E. DILLARD, Petitioner, v. CHARLES DANIELS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 15, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-932-TC (D. Or. Aug. 15, 2006)