From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DiLieto v. Keszyki

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 8, 1986
509 A.2d 567 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)

Opinion

(4429)

Argued May 8

Decided May 8, 1986

Application for a prejudgment real estate attachment, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven at Meriden, where the court, Foti, J., granted the plaintiff's application; thereafter, the court, Smith, J., granted the defendants' motion for stay of the order allowing the prejudgment attachment, from which the plaintiff appealed to this court. Remanded for further proceedings.

Bruce L. Levin, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Mark C. Gersz filed a brief for the appellees (defendants).


By motion filed March 20, 1986, the plaintiff, who is the appellant, moved in this court that the order appealed from be set aside because the defendants, who are the appellees, had not provided the plaintiff's counsel with a copy of their brief. On April 15, 1986, we ordered that the trial court's order granting a stay of attachment be vacated and that a new hearing be held unless the defendants filed a new certification of service of their brief to opposing counsel on or before April 25, 1986. At oral argument held on May 8, 1986, the defendants' counsel did not appear, and the plaintiff's counsel informed us that he had not yet received a copy of the defendants' brief as ordered. Therefore, in accordance with our order of April 15, 1986, the order of the trial court staying the attachment should be vacated for failure of the defendants to defend against the appeal with proper diligence. Practice Book 3109.


Summaries of

DiLieto v. Keszyki

Appellate Court of Connecticut
May 8, 1986
509 A.2d 567 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)
Case details for

DiLieto v. Keszyki

Case Details

Full title:JAMES DILIETO v. MITCHELL KESZYKI ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 8, 1986

Citations

509 A.2d 567 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986)
509 A.2d 567