From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dike v. Dike

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 4, 2022
No. 1D21-3246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

1D21-3246

05-04-2022

Godwin Chiedozie Dike, Appellant, v. Ebony Chinonyere Dike, Appellee.

Godwin Chiedozie Dike, pro se, Appellant. Aaron B. Wentz, Kelly Simon, and Amanda Dietzen, Aaron B. Wentz, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellee.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Mary Polson, Judge.

Godwin Chiedozie Dike, pro se, Appellant.

Aaron B. Wentz, Kelly Simon, and Amanda Dietzen, Aaron B. Wentz, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Godwin Chiedozie Dike appeals an order rescinding prior orders relating to child custody and related matters due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not a final order or an appealable nonfinal order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130.

Rowe, C.J., and Osterhaus and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dike v. Dike

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 4, 2022
No. 1D21-3246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Dike v. Dike

Case Details

Full title:Godwin Chiedozie Dike, Appellant, v. Ebony Chinonyere Dike, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

No. 1D21-3246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 4, 2022)