From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dijkstra v. Campos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:21-cv-01014-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01014-SKO (PC)

08-31-2021

CODY DIJKSTRA, Plaintiff, v. CAMPOS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff Cody Dijkstra has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). (Doc. 10.) Under the rule, a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dijkstra v. Campos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 31, 2021
1:21-cv-01014-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Dijkstra v. Campos

Case Details

Full title:CODY DIJKSTRA, Plaintiff, v. CAMPOS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01014-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2021)