From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Digital Encoding Factory v. Iron Mt. Inf. Management

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2007
2:06cv1449, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)

Opinion

2:06cv1449, Electronic Filing.

August 15, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiffs' Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court and was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (the "R R"), filed on July 1, 2007, recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied, but that Defendants' request to strike the plea for attorney's fees should be granted. Objections were filed by the Defendant on July 23, 2007, and a Response was filed by the Plaintiff on August 8, 2007.

After review of the pleadings in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the parties' pleadings subsequent thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this day 15th of August, 2007

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied, except that the motion to strike Plaintiff's plea for fees is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Digital Encoding Factory v. Iron Mt. Inf. Management

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 15, 2007
2:06cv1449, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Digital Encoding Factory v. Iron Mt. Inf. Management

Case Details

Full title:DIGITAL ENCODING FACTORY, LLC, MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC, and ELECTRONIC…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

2:06cv1449, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 2007)