From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Digital Ally, Inc. v. Util. Assocs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2015
594 F. App'x 682 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1420

02-10-2015

DIGITAL ALLY, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UTILITY ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee

ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for plaintiff-appellant. DAVID S. MORELAND, Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NATHAN SLOAN, STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in No. 2:13-cv-02550-SAC-KGS, Senior Judge Sam A. Crow.

JUDGMENT

ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for plaintiff-appellant. DAVID S. MORELAND, Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by NATHAN SLOAN, STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Digital Ally, Inc. v. Util. Assocs., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 10, 2015
594 F. App'x 682 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Digital Ally, Inc. v. Util. Assocs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DIGITAL ALLY, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UTILITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

594 F. App'x 682 (Fed. Cir. 2015)