Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00682-WJM-MEH
02-04-2013
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 4, 2013.
Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Modify Scheduling Order [filed February 1, 2013; docket #51 ] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1D, which requires that any motion for extension of time "state a date certain for the requested extension of time." The Court notes that the motion currently is partially opposed; thus, to the extent the Plaintiff chooses to re-file the motion and it is unopposed by some or all Defendants, the Court encourages the parties to work together to propose new deadlines for discovery as set forth in the governing Scheduling Order.