Dietz v. Fifty Plus Five Corp.

2 Citing cases

  1. Garrigan v. LaSalle Coca-Cola Co.

    129 N.W.2d 897 (Mich. 1964)   Cited 6 times

    A much better gauge is then available for measuring any claim of inadequacy or failure to follow instructions. See Fordon v. Bender, supra. Mosley v. Dati, 363 Mich. 690, A'Eno v. Lowry, 367 Mich. 657, Dietz v. Fifty Plus Five Corporation, 371 Mich. 28. As to plaintiff's request for partial new trial as to damages, attention is directed to the statement in the recent case of Bias v. Ausbury, 369 Mich. 378, 383, as follows:

  2. Redmond v. Sheer

    122 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 1963)

    " The case in foregoing respects corresponds with simultaneously considered Dietz v. Fifty Plus Five Corporation, 371 Mich. 28, in which like action of the trial judge has come to this court for review. Views recorded there call for similar action here. In all fairness this opinion should not conclude without recognition anew of a known fact; that judges are men and men are different, and that men of high rectitude do find it difficult on occasion to suppress unconscious indications of their feelings and convictions; whereas others do not. The witting, the unwitting, the conscious, the subconscious and the coconscious, are never far apart in the course of human conduct.