From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietrich v. Palisades Interstate Park Comm

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Feb 1, 1921
114 Misc. 429 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1921)

Opinion

February, 1921.

Arthur J. Levine, for plaintiff.

Barry, Wainwright, Thacher Symmers (Herbert Barry and Joseph A. Warren, of counsel), for defendant.


This is a demurrer to a complaint brought on for trial as a contested motion. The complaint states a cause of action brought by the father for the loss of services and earnings of his infant daughter, and also for expenses incurred as a result of the injuries the said infant daughter received while a passenger on the steamer Clermont, alleged to be owned and operated by the defendant. The facts, as well as the grounds of the demurrer, are precisely the same as in the case of Dietrich v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission, the decision in which is handed down herewith. I make my opinion in that case stand as my determination in this case.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Dietrich v. Palisades Interstate Park Comm

Supreme Court, New York Special Term
Feb 1, 1921
114 Misc. 429 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1921)
Case details for

Dietrich v. Palisades Interstate Park Comm

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE B. DIETRICH, Plaintiff, v . PALISADES INTERSTATE PARK COMMISSION…

Court:Supreme Court, New York Special Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1921

Citations

114 Misc. 429 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1921)
187 N.Y.S. 457

Citing Cases

Sadigur v. State of New York

The court held, in dismissing the complaint, that while the statute waived the immunity from suit, it did not…