From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietrich v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1983
92 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Summary

In Dietrich v. Chemical Bank (92 A.D.2d 786), released simultaneously herewith, the bank adhered to that maximum and so we have been unanimous in affirming the dismissal of the complaint.

Summary of this case from Jacobs v. Citibank

Opinion

March 8, 1983


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stecher, J.), entered on October 29, 1981, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Stecher, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. The appeal from the order of said court entered on October 27, 1981, is dismissed, without costs and without disbursements, as having been subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Kassal, JJ. [ 115 Misc.2d 713.]


Summaries of

Dietrich v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 1983
92 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

In Dietrich v. Chemical Bank (92 A.D.2d 786), released simultaneously herewith, the bank adhered to that maximum and so we have been unanimous in affirming the dismissal of the complaint.

Summary of this case from Jacobs v. Citibank
Case details for

Dietrich v. Chemical Bank

Case Details

Full title:JULIA A. DIETRICH, Appellant, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1983

Citations

92 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Jacobs v. Citibank

During the period in question, section 32.1 of the General Regulations of the New York State Banking Board (…