From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dietle v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0004-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0004-CMK-P.

May 4, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Pending before the court is petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal. Good cause appearing therefor, this action will be dismissed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). The notice of dismissal renders the pending motion to dismiss moot.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Upon petitioner' notice of voluntary dismissal (Doc. 24), this action is dismissed without prejudice;

2. The pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is denied as moot; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Dietle v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0004-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Dietle v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL DIETLE, Petitioner, v. MIKE O. McDONALD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0004-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)