Opinion
23-12184
10-04-2024
RYAN CHARLES DIEMOND, Plaintiff, v. NOAH NAGY, Defendant.
Honorable Robert J. White, Judge
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND/CORRECT (ECF NO. 27)
ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Ryan Charles Diemond moved for leave to amend and correct a date error in his response to Nagy's motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 27. The Honorable Robert J. White referred the case to the undersigned for all pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ECF No. 23.
In October 2024, the Court entered a report and recommendation to deny Nagy's motion for summary judgment and considered Diemond's response. ECF No. 29. Thus, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Diemond's motion to amend and correct, ECF No. 27.
NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file objections with the assigned district judge. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). The district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. “When an objection is filed to a magistrate judge's ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.