From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diederich v. Wetzel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 20, 2019
170 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2015–10410 Index No. 4645/11

03-20-2019

Michael DIEDERICH, Jr., Respondent, v. Lorraine WETZEL, etc., Appellant.

Dwight D. Joyce, Stony Point, NY, for appellant. Michael D. Diederich, Jr., suing herein as Michael Diederich, Jr., Stony Point, NY, respondent pro se.


Dwight D. Joyce, Stony Point, NY, for appellant.

Michael D. Diederich, Jr., suing herein as Michael Diederich, Jr., Stony Point, NY, respondent pro se.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, an attorney, represented the defendant in various actions over multiple years. After the defendant refused to pay the plaintiff's fees, the plaintiff commenced this action. On a prior appeal, this Court, inter alia, granted the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability upon the defendant's failure to appear or answer, and remitted the matter for an inquest on the amount of attorney's fees, if any, to which the plaintiff was entitled (see Diederich v. Wetzel , 112 A.D.3d 883, 979 N.Y.S.2d 605 ). After an inquest, the Supreme Court awarded the plaintiff the principal sum of $ 150,000. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the trial court, and we may render a judgment we find warranted by the facts, bearing in mind that, in a close case, the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v. Town of Bedford , 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 350, 458 N.E.2d 809 ; Manson v. Kejo Enters., LLC , 145 A.D.3d 994, 995, 44 N.Y.S.3d 167 ). Here, in view of the evidence submitted at the inquest, including, among other things, time sheets showing the time the plaintiff spent working on the defendant's cases, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination awarding the plaintiff the sum of $ 150,000.

DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diederich v. Wetzel

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 20, 2019
170 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Diederich v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:Michael Diederich, Jr., respondent, v. Lorraine Wetzel, etc., appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2063
94 N.Y.S.3d 877

Citing Cases

McKinnon Doxsee Agency, Inc. v. Gallina

The power of this Court "to review findings of fact rendered after a nonjury trial is not limited to whether…