Opinion
20210325
05-26-2022
In the Matter of Lawrence Didier Frederick Fremgen, Stutsman County State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Lawrence Didier, Respondent and Appellant
Megan B. Carmichael, Assistant State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge.
Megan B. Carmichael, Assistant State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.
Per Curiam
[¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from the district court's order denying his application for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the court's finding that he has serious difficulty controlling his behavior is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, clear and convincing evidence exists for the court's finding Didier has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. The court's finding is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte