From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Didier v. Didier

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 3, 1970
233 So. 2d 248 (La. 1970)

Summary

In Didier, the court of appeal affirmed the trial court's recognition of the Arkansas divorce decree based on its finding that "[r]ightly or wrongly, [the Arkansas] court decided that it did have jurisdiction, i.e., that appellee fulfilled the residency requirements" and because the appellant therein did "not allege any facts which would show that she would be entitled to attack the Arkansas judgment in the Arkansas court[,] Louisiana is bound to give full faith and credit to the Arkansas decree."

Summary of this case from Biosonix, LLC v. Olson

Opinion

No. 50414.

April 3, 1970.

IN RE: MRS. ELLEN H. DIDIER APPLYING FOR CERTIORARI, OR WRIT OF REVIEW, TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.


Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, J., on the facts found the result is correct.


Summaries of

Didier v. Didier

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 3, 1970
233 So. 2d 248 (La. 1970)

In Didier, the court of appeal affirmed the trial court's recognition of the Arkansas divorce decree based on its finding that "[r]ightly or wrongly, [the Arkansas] court decided that it did have jurisdiction, i.e., that appellee fulfilled the residency requirements" and because the appellant therein did "not allege any facts which would show that she would be entitled to attack the Arkansas judgment in the Arkansas court[,] Louisiana is bound to give full faith and credit to the Arkansas decree."

Summary of this case from Biosonix, LLC v. Olson
Case details for

Didier v. Didier

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN H. DIDIER v. HOMER W. DIDIER

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 3, 1970

Citations

233 So. 2d 248 (La. 1970)
255 La. 806

Citing Cases

Biosonix, LLC v. Olson

Was The Trial Court Precluded From Re–Litigating Whether Olson Was Subject To In Personam Jurisdiction Of The…