From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickman v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Feb 2, 1999
Case No. 98-2954 (Wis. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 1999)

Opinion

Case No. 98-2954.

Opinion Released: February 2, 1999. Opinion Filed: February 2, 1999. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: CONRAD A. RICHARDS, Judge. Appeal dismissed.


Dale and Patricia Johnson appeal pro se from a small claims default judgment entered in favor of Thomas and Robin Dickman. On September 24, 1998, the Dickmans filed a small claims summons and complaint against the Johnsons. The pleadings scheduled the return date for October 6, 1998, at 1 p.m. and required the Johnsons' appearance. The pleadings also notified them that if they failed to appear, a judgment may be entered in favor of the Dickmans. Before the return date, the Johnsons filed an answer and counterclaim. Essentially, the Johnsons denied the Dickmans' allegations and contended the complaint was frivolous. When the Johnsons failed to appear on the return date, the circuit court granted a default judgment for $5,000 plus costs in the Dickmans' favor and dismissed the counterclaim.

Notably, the Johnsons did not move the circuit court to reopen the default judgment. Instead, they filed an appeal to this court arguing that the default judgment should not have been granted, in addition to arguing the merits of the action. Section 799.29(1), Stats., however, bars an appeal from a small claims default judgment. This section provides, "There shall be no appeal from default judgments, but the trial court may, by order, reopen default judgments upon notice and motion or petition duly made and good cause shown." Within six months after entry of judgment, the Johnsons must first file a motion with the circuit court to reopen the default judgment. Section 799.29(1)(c), Stats. The only permitted appeal is then from a court's order granting or denying a motion to reopen a default judgment. General Tele. Co. v. A Corp. , 147 Wis.2d 461, 465-66, 433 N.W.2d 264, 265 (Ct.App. 1988). Because this court has no jurisdiction to review a small claims default judgment, the appeal must be dismissed. See id .

By the Court. — Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Dickman v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Feb 2, 1999
Case No. 98-2954 (Wis. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 1999)
Case details for

Dickman v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS DICKMAN AND ROBIN DICKMAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DALE W…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Date published: Feb 2, 1999

Citations

Case No. 98-2954 (Wis. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 1999)