From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickinson v. Mullaney

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2006
277 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2006)

Opinion

Jo Anne Sulik, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, in opposition.

Decided March 2, 2006.


The respondents' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 689 (AC 25704), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had improperly applied the defense of laches in this habeas corpus action?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17614.


Summaries of

Dickinson v. Mullaney

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 2, 2006
277 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2006)
Case details for

Dickinson v. Mullaney

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN F. DICKINSON v. GARRELL MULLANEY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

277 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2006)

Citing Cases

Dickinson v. Mullane

We granted the respondents' certification to appeal to this court limited to the following issue: "Did the…