From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 20, 1989
193 Ga. App. 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A89A2324.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 20, 1989.

Traffic violation, etc. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Campbell.

Frank G. Smith, for appellant.

Patrick H. Head, Solicitor, Beverly M. Hartung, Diane L. Matassino, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee.


The appellant, Scotty Dickerson, was convicted of making an improper right turn and underage possession of alcohol.

A Cobb County police officer stopped Dickerson after observing him make a right turn from the left turn lane onto another road in Cobb County. While talking with Dickerson, the police officer noticed a faint odor of alcohol and asked Dickerson if he had been drinking. Dickerson acknowledged that he had drunk a part of a beer at a nearby shopping center. An alco-sensor test was positive for alcohol, and the police officer arrested Dickerson. Held:

1. On appeal, Dickerson seems to contend that the State failed to prove venue because it was not shown whether the traffic violation and stop occurred outside or inside the incorporated limits of the City of Smyrna. Relying upon Ga. Const., Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. III (b), which states that unless otherwise provided by law, no county may exercise police powers inside the boundaries of a municipality except by contract with the municipality affected, Dickerson further contends that his arrest by the county police officer was unauthorized, since the State failed to prove a contract between the county and the City of Smyrna.

Venue in this case was proven by the uncontradicted testimony of the arresting officer that the traffic violation and stop took place in Cobb County. See Green v. State, 182 Ga. App. 695 (1) ( 356 S.E.2d 673) (1987). The arresting officer, having witnessed the actual traffic violation, was authorized to arrest Dickerson under OCGA § 17-4-23. Compare Glazner v. State, 170 Ga. App. 810 ( 318 S.E.2d 233) (1984). Dickerson's contentions are without merit.

2. The evidence regarding Dickerson's underage possession of alcohol, in violation of OCGA § 3-3-23, was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Benham, JJ., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 20, 1989.


Summaries of

Dickerson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 20, 1989
193 Ga. App. 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Dickerson v. State

Case Details

Full title:DICKERSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 20, 1989

Citations

193 Ga. App. 605 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
388 S.E.2d 736

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

Shy v. State, 234 Ga. 816, 822 ( 218 S.E.2d 599) (1975); Aldridge v. State, 247 Ga. 142, 145 (2) ( 274 S.E.2d…

In the Interest of B. J. G

Although there is a conflict in the evidence, we find that there was sufficient evidence from which any…