From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerson v. Gantz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1968
389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 21302.

February 7, 1968. Rehearing Denied March 26, 1968.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Raymond E. Plummer, Judge.

M. Ashley Dickerson (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, in pro. per.

W.C. Arnold (argued), Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


Appellant is an Anchorage lawyer. At one time state grievance proceedings were pending against her. They have been dismissed by stipulation. She has a certificate of good standing now. And, the old proceedings are dead.

Yet, she still pursues a district attorney and members of the state bar committee on various theories for their fruitless efforts. On motion, her complaint was dismissed and she appeals.

We have reviewed the record and find no ruling of the district court clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dickerson v. Gantz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 26, 1968
389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Dickerson v. Gantz

Case Details

Full title:Mahala Ashley DICKERSON, Appellant, v. Richard GANTZ, James Delaney, Jr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 26, 1968

Citations

389 F.2d 387 (9th Cir. 1968)