Opinion
Action No. C 3:10-cv-00435-JSW (JSC)
10-12-2011
DESMOND J. DICKERSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation; WAYNE G. TUCKER, in his capacity as Chief of Police for CITY OF OAKLAND; JASON MITCHELL, JOSEPH FOREMAN, and JOSEPH FONG, individually, and in their capacity as police officers for CITY OF OAKLAND; and, DOES 1-25, inclusive Defendants.
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173 LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET Attorneys for Plaintiff DESMOND J. DICKERSON ARLENE ROSEN, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # 69888
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq./ State Bar # 109173
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
Attorneys for Plaintiff DESMOND J. DICKERSON
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
On September 2, 1011, the parties reached a tentative settlement agreement in this case before the Honorable Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. The agreement is subject only to the final approval of the Oakland City Council. Accordingly, It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties in consultation with their respective attorneys, and by their attorneys, that this case be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing shall Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
WILLIAM E. SIMMONS, Supervising City Attorney
ARLENE ROSEN, Senior Deputy City Attorney
ARLENE ROSEN, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the above captioned case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. IT IS SO ORDERED.
HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Court Judge