From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickerson v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-289 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-289 Erie.

December 7, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 7, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 93], entered on the record on November 16, 2007, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion of Retaliation, construed as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 80] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Plaintiff filed objections on November 21, 2007 [Doc. No. 89]. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the oral Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 80] is DENIED.

The oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 93] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, entered on the record on November 16, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Dickerson v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-289 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Dickerson v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DICKERSON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MARILYN S. BROOKS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 7, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-289 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2007)