From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 24, 2009
297 S.W.3d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91531.

November 24, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Prior report: 167 S.W.3d 734.



ORDER


Movant, Timothy Dickens, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Dickens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 24, 2009
297 S.W.3d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Dickens v. State

Case Details

Full title:Timothy DICKENS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 673 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)