From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dickens v. New York City Tr. Auth.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50090 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

No. 2003-110 K C.

Decided January 27, 2004.

Appeal by defendant New York City Transit Authority from an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (K. Yellen, J.), entered October 16, 2002, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) (7).

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., ARONIN and PATTERSON, JJ.


In this action, plaintiffs seek to recover for property damage to their automobile which was allegedly rear-ended by defendant New York City Transit Authority's (NYCTA) bus on November 23, 1998. Defendant NYCTA moved to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to timely serve a notice of claim, in accordance with General Municipal Law § 50-e and Public Authorities Law § 1212. In our opinion, the notice of claim timely filed and served by plaintiff sufficiently apprised defendant of a possible property damage claim, and afforded it an adequate opportunity to conduct an investigation of the property damage claim while the information was readily available ( see Caselli v. City of New York, 105 AD2d 251). Accordingly, the court below did not err in denying defendant NYCTA's motion to dismiss the complaint against it.


Summaries of

Dickens v. New York City Tr. Auth.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50090 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Dickens v. New York City Tr. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:GERALD and MARIE DICKENS, Respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50090 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)