Opinion
2:21-cv-00087-APG-VCF
08-11-2023
MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTORNEYS AT LAW. PHILIP J. TRENCHAK, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY DICKENS JACKSON LEWIS P.C. KIRSTEN A. MILTON, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GNLV CORP DBA GOLDEN NUGGET LAS VEGAS
MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTORNEYS AT LAW. PHILIP J. TRENCHAK, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY DICKENS
JACKSON LEWIS P.C. KIRSTEN A. MILTON, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GNLV CORP DBA GOLDEN NUGGET LAS VEGAS
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, all parties hereby stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Reply”). This is the parties' first request specifically to extend this deadline. Defendant's current deadline is August 11, 2023. This request is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay.
The parties have made previous requests to extend the dispositive motion deadlines as set forth in the May 5, 2021 Order; however, in the past, the extensions were based either on the fact that the parties had to extend the discovery deadline or at Plaintiff's request to extend the deadline for him to file his Response. ECF Nos. 15, 35, 43, 45, 47, 49, and 51. This is only the first request by Defendant specifically to extend its Reply deadline.
This extension is necessary because Defendant's in-house employee responsible for managing this litigation is out of the country for two weeks. And, on the subsequent third week, Defense counsel, who is solely responsible for this case, will be on a pre-planned family vacation. Therefore, Defendant needs additional time to prepare and finalize its Reply.
Therefore, Plaintiff's counsel has agreed and the parties hereby stipulate that Defendant shall have up to and including September 11 2023, to file its Reply.
ORDER
IT IS SOLDERED.