From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dicey v. Pickens

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 30, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0482 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0482 GEB KJM P.

March 30, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file motions to compel discovery pursuant to the court's order of December 4, 2006 and has supported this order with a showing of good cause.

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's March 12, 2007 motion for an extension of time is granted.

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file motions to compel discovery.

3. Plaintiff's March 19, 2007 request for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Dicey v. Pickens

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 30, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0482 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Dicey v. Pickens

Case Details

Full title:BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, Plaintiff, v. S. PICKENS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 30, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0482 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2007)