Dicey v. Hanks

Full title: BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, Plaintiff, v. W. HANKS, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2015

2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2015)

Opinion

BERLAN LYNELL DICEY, Plaintiff, v. W. HANKS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-2018 JAM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 27, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         On February 10, 2015, defendant Statti filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff was granted an additional forty-five days to oppose the motion. ECF No. 22. Forty-five days have passed and plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendant Statti's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to defendant Statti's motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendant Statti be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).