From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Vance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2990 453/11 6367

02-02-2017

In re Gilberto Diaz, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. Vance, etc., et al., Respondents.

Gilberto Diaz, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Michelle Warren and Ahmed Almudallal, respondents. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for Hon. Arlene Goldberg, respondent.


Gilberto Diaz, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Michelle Warren and Ahmed Almudallal, respondents.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Jonathan D. Conley of counsel), for Hon. Arlene Goldberg, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 2, 2017

CLERK


Summaries of

Diaz v. Vance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 2, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Diaz v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:In re Gilberto Diaz, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. Vance, etc., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)