From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Oct 19, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2260-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Mandamus 28 U.S.C. § 1361, Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2260-TWT.

October 19, 2006


ORDER AND OPINION


Plaintiff, Jose Diaz, has submitted a document to the Court which the Clerk has filed as a mandamus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361. In his petition, Plaintiff complains that the law library at the Calhoun State Prison is inadequate, that the mail room "9 times out often" does not send out inmates' legal mail, and that the grievance procedure at the prison is time consuming and inadequate. Plaintiff states that he is seeking mandamus relief.

However, Plaintiff has submitted the instant civil action without submitting the $350.00 filing fee, and this Court finds that he is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. According to Subsection (g) of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a prisoner is prohibited from bringing a civil action in federal court in forma pauperis "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury."

The records of the Clerk of the Court indicate that Plaintiff has filed at least three previous civil actions while a state prisoner, which were dismissed prior to service of process as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiffs prior prisoner complaints that were dismissed as frivolous include the following: Diaz v. Conway, et al., No. 00-13973-I (11th Cir. 2001) (appeal from 1:00-CV-112-TWT); Diaz v. Conway, et al., 1:00-CV-1558-TWT (N.D. Ga. 2000); and Diaz v. DeLong, et al., 1:99-CV-3379-TWT (N.D. Ga. 2000). Furthermore, this Court finds no indication that Plaintiff is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, leave for Plaintiff to proceedin forma pauperis is hereby DENIED.

According to the Eleventh Circuit, "the proper procedure is for the district court to dismiss the complaint without prejudice when it denies the prisoner leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the three strikes provision of § 1915(g). The prisoner . . . must pay the filing fee at the time he initiates the suit." Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the instant action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Diaz v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Oct 19, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2260-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Diaz v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2260-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2006)