From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Subia

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 6, 1971
446 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 71-1471 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

July 16, 1971. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ernest Guinn, District Judge.

Mark F. Howell, J.B. Ochoa, Jr.; Clarence Moyers, Albert Armendariz, Frank T. Ivy, Edward F. Sherman, El Paso, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John B. Luscombe, Jr., Travis White, City Atty., John C. Ross, Jr., Wade Adkins, Asst. City Attys., El Paso, Tex., for defendants-appellees; Peticolas, Luscombe, Stephens Windle, El Paso, Tex., of counsel.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.



The order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs' third amended complaint is affirmed. We agree with the District Court that plaintiffs failed to set out "a short and plain statement of the claim" as required by Rule 8(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. We do not reach other grounds asserted as basis for the dismissal which is, of course, without prejudice.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Subia

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 6, 1971
446 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

Diaz v. Subia

Case Details

Full title:Luz Acosta DIAZ et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carlos SUBIA et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 6, 1971

Citations

446 F.2d 882 (5th Cir. 1971)