From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P

02-29-2012

RANDOLPH M. DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 9, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 16), are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Defendants Ram and Martel are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Diaz v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Diaz v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH M. DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)