From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2981 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2981 GGH P.

November 17, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Santa Clara County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Santa Clara County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

DATED: November 17, 2010


Summaries of

Diaz v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2010
No. CIV S-10-2981 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Diaz v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:FELIPE DIAZ, Petitioner, v. M. MARTEL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 17, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2981 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2010)