From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
2:21-cv-0916 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0916 KJM KJN P

10-02-2023

FELIPE POLANCO DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. LYNCH et al., Defendant.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

KENDALL J. NEIMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Having reviewed defendant's motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR project, the Court finds that the request is supported by good cause. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to opt out (ECF No. 36) is granted;
2. The ADR stay of this action (ECF No. 34) is lifted; and
3. Defendant is ordered to file a responsive pleading within thirty days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
2:21-cv-0916 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Diaz v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:FELIPE POLANCO DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. LYNCH et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0916 KJM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)