From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Law Office of Michael C. Roberts, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2014
Case No. 14 C 440 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 14 C 440

02-06-2014

LUIS DIAZ, Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL C. ROBERTS, P.C., Appellee.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Although this action was filed on January 22, 2014, pro se appellant Luis Diaz ("Diaz") has ignored the explicit directive of this District Court's LR 5.2(f) that requires the delivery to this Court's chambers, within one business day after filing, of a paper copy of the pleadings and other documents required for consideration of the appeal. To underscore the importance of that requirement to the case management procedures followed by this Court, the first paragraph in its website repeats the requirement, adding that a delivery to this Court's chambers on the date of filing, if possible, would be appreciated (although such earlier delivery is not essential).

In an effort to monitor compliance with that requirement (which has regrettably not always been adhered to by litigants), both this Court's secretary and its courtroom deputy maintain lists of all such deliveries to this Court's chambers. Although that recordkeeping is intended to be error-free, if Diaz were to establish that what is said in this memorandum order is in error, the sanction called for by this memorandum order will of course be rescinded.

Despite the literal one-business-day requirement of LR 5.2(f), this Court has customarily allowed a grace period -- at least a few working days, sometimes longer -- before the issuance of this type of memorandum order. In this instance that added time has elapsed without compliance by appellant Diaz, and this Court hereby orders:

That variance stems from obtaining the Clerk's Office printouts reflecting new case filings only sporadically, rather than on a regular (say weekly) basis.
--------

1. that the missing copy of the appellate documents be delivered to this Court's chambers forthwith and
2. that such delivery be accompanied by a check for $100 payable to the "Clerk of the District Court" by reason of the LR 5.2(f) violation, a requirement foreshadowed by the opening provision in this Court's website.

___________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Diaz v. Law Office of Michael C. Roberts, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 6, 2014
Case No. 14 C 440 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Diaz v. Law Office of Michael C. Roberts, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:LUIS DIAZ, Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL C. ROBERTS, P.C., Appellee.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. 14 C 440 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2014)