From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Kugan

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 9, 2021
No. A-3288-19 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

A-3288-19

11-09-2021

GLENNY DIAZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THURAI KUGAN and BRENNA P. KUGAN, Defendants-Appellants.

Thomas W. Matthews argued the cause for appellants (Soriano, Henkel, Biehl & Matthews, attorneys; Thomas W. Matthews, of counsel and on the briefs). John R. Gorman argued the cause for respondents (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman & Mahoney, PA, attorneys; John R. Gorman, of counsel and on the brief; Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued September 28, 2021

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-6953-17.

Thomas W. Matthews argued the cause for appellants (Soriano, Henkel, Biehl & Matthews, attorneys; Thomas W. Matthews, of counsel and on the briefs).

John R. Gorman argued the cause for respondents (Lutz, Shafranski, Gorman & Mahoney, PA, attorneys; John R. Gorman, of counsel and on the brief; Randi S. Greenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges Messano and Enright.

PER CURIAM.

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Kugan

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Nov 9, 2021
No. A-3288-19 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Diaz v. Kugan

Case Details

Full title:GLENNY DIAZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THURAI KUGAN and BRENNA P. KUGAN…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

No. A-3288-19 (App. Div. Nov. 9, 2021)