From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Diaz

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 24, 2013
NO. 02-12-00322-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00322-CV

01-24-2013

MANUEL DIAZ, JR. APPELLANT v. MELISSA ANN DIAZ APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WICHITA COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On December 20, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Diaz v. Diaz

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 24, 2013
NO. 02-12-00322-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Diaz v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL DIAZ, JR. APPELLANT v. MELISSA ANN DIAZ APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-12-00322-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2013)