From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Cates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00744-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00744-DLB PC

01-09-2012

RICHARD DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


(DOC. 6)


RESPONSE DUE WITHIN EIGHTEEN DAYS

Plaintiff Richard Diaz ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November16, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's original complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to amend, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Doc. 6. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not responded.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to show cause within eighteen (18) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim. Failure to timely respond or otherwise show cause will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order and failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Diaz v. Cates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00744-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Diaz v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CV-00744-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)