From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diaz v. Berning

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2014
No. 66990 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)

Opinion

No. 66990

12-12-2014

JESSIE MATTHEW DIAZ, Petitioner, v. KATHERINE BERNING, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner challenges his judgment of conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
cc: Jessie Matthew Diaz

Fry & Berning, LLC

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Diaz v. Berning

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2014
No. 66990 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Diaz v. Berning

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE MATTHEW DIAZ, Petitioner, v. KATHERINE BERNING, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 12, 2014

Citations

No. 66990 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)