From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dias v. Fisher

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:20-cv-0410-JAM-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0410-JAM-DB P

11-22-2021

HUMBERTO CASTILLO DIAS, Petitioner, v. RAYTHEL FISHER, Respondent.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 17, 2021, are ADOPTED in full;

2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case; and

3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Dias v. Fisher

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:20-cv-0410-JAM-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Dias v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:HUMBERTO CASTILLO DIAS, Petitioner, v. RAYTHEL FISHER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-0410-JAM-DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)