From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamondstone v. Gutstadt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 807 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

June, 1901.

Shafer Levin, for appellant.

Manheim Manheim, for respondents.


The real issue upon the trial related solely to an increase of three cents a dozen, insisted by the plaintiff to have been made between him and the defendants. The plaintiff's testimony was too inexact in favor of such an agreement, while each defendant expressly denied the making of such an arrangement. The court below found for the defendants on the question and awarded the plaintiff somewhat more than the defendants had paid into court, but without costs. We think this conclusion should rest undisturbed.

Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Diamondstone v. Gutstadt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 807 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Diamondstone v. Gutstadt

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL DIAMONDSTONE, Appellant, v . ISIDOR GUTSTADT et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 807 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)