From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 26, 2023
Civil Action 4:20cv397 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20cv397 CRIMINAL ACTION 4:17cr118(1)

09-26-2023

HOWARD G. DIAMOND, #27213-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett, who issued a Report and Recommendation (#51) concluding that the Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Movant, with the assistance of counsel, filed objections (Dkt. #54).

The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections of Movant are without merit.

It is accordingly ORDERED that Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#22) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED.

Signed this date


Summaries of

Diamond v. United States

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 26, 2023
Civil Action 4:20cv397 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Diamond v. United States

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD G. DIAMOND, #27213-078 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 26, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:20cv397 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 26, 2023)