From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 1, 1914
87 Misc. 305 (N.Y. App. Term 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.

Walter C. Evans (Walter R. Kuhn, of counsel), for appellant.

Henry Lieb, for respondent.


Plaintiff sued for personal injuries caused by an automobile truck. The evidence shows, without contradiction, that the truck was owned by the defendant, and that the wages of the chauffeur were paid by the defendant; that the truck, however, was rented out to another concern, the Turner Company, which was engaged in snow removal; that the chauffeur took his instructions from that company, and that, in point of fact, although his wages were, under the agreement, to be paid by the defendant, he, personally, had been hired for this job by the Turner Company. Under the circumstances, if there is any liability, it is that of the Turner Company and not of the defendant under the rule which we have followed in Di Salvo v. Larkin Son, Inc., 83 Misc. 111. See, also, Hanatsek v. Wilson, 161 A.D. 634.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

SEABURY and COHALAN, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 1, 1914
87 Misc. 305 (N.Y. App. Term 1914)
Case details for

Diamond v. Sternberg Motor Truck Co.

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP DIAMOND, Respondent, v . STERNBERG MOTOR TRUCK COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

87 Misc. 305 (N.Y. App. Term 1914)
149 N.Y.S. 1000

Citing Cases

Harris v. Bell

The custody of the automobile, instead of being by reason of agency, was merely a bailment, and the bailor…

Devaney v. Lawler Corp.

The circumstance of who pays the servant for his service is not necessarily a controlling factor. ( Burns v.…