From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. City of Fla. City

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 12, 2014
134 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D12–2260.

2014-03-12

Rhonda DIAMOND, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF FLORIDA CITY, Appellee.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami—Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. Stok Folk + Kon and Robert A. Stok and Josh R. Dell (Aventura), for appellants. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellee.


An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami—Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge.
Stok Folk + Kon and Robert A. Stok and Josh R. Dell (Aventura), for appellants. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. SeeFla. R. Civ. P. 1.220(d)(1).


Summaries of

Diamond v. City of Fla. City

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 12, 2014
134 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Diamond v. City of Fla. City

Case Details

Full title:Rhonda DIAMOND, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF FLORIDA CITY, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

134 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)