From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamond v. Ascenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1949
276 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

December 12, 1949.


In an action under section 29 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ as plaintiff, order denying defendants' motion, made more than two years after the cause of action accrued, to permit defendants to serve an amended answer, withdrawing or omitting certain admissions made in and by the answer, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Luback v. Hirsch, 232 App. Div. 691, and cases there cited; Eisenberg v. Louis Adler Realty Co., 299 N.Y. 572.) We express no opinion upon the effect of the admissions so sought to be withdrawn. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diamond v. Ascenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 1949
276 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Diamond v. Ascenzo

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL DIAMOND, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ASCENZO et al., Individually and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)