From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diamant v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 24, 2019
No. 78793-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 24, 2019)

Opinion

No. 78793-COA

06-24-2019

ZAFRIF YAHALOM DIAMANT, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE VINCENT OCHOA, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JOSEPHINE CAROLE DIAMANT, N/K/A JOSEPHINE CAROLE TARKANIAN, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges the district court's resolution of a post-divorce decree motion to modify spousal support.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of prohibition may be warranted when a district court acts without or in excess of its jurisdiction. NRS 34.320; Club Vista Fin. Servs., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 128 Nev. 224, 228, 276 P.3d 246, 249 (2012). This court has discretion as to whether to entertain a petition for extraordinary relief and will not do so when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and supporting documents filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); D.R. Horton, 123 Nev. at 475, 168 P.3d at 737.

It is so ORDERED.

We deny as moot petitioner's request to stay the proceedings below. --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge

Vaccarino Law Office

Black & LoBello

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Diamant v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 24, 2019
No. 78793-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Diamant v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:ZAFRIF YAHALOM DIAMANT, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 24, 2019

Citations

No. 78793-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 24, 2019)