From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diallo v. Grand Bay Assoc. Enters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 2011
85 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5399.

June 23, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered February 18, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on his claim for declaratory relief, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted to the extent of declaring that the deed, dated June 28, 2001, purportedly conveying the subject premises from plaintiff to defendant Grand Bay Associates Enterprises, Inc. is null and void.

Calman Greenberg, Bronx, for appellant.

Before: Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.


It is undisputed that Grand Bay, which did not oppose plaintiffs motion, is a nonexistent entity, having never attained corporate status. An entity that has neither de facto nor de jure status cannot take title to real property, notwithstanding that the instrument purports to convey the real property to it ( see Matter of Hausman, 13 NY3d 408, 413). Accordingly, the purported conveyance is void ( id.).

[Prior Case History: 26 Misc 3d 1222(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50214(U).]


Summaries of

Diallo v. Grand Bay Assoc. Enters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 2011
85 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Diallo v. Grand Bay Assoc. Enters

Case Details

Full title:IBRAHIM DIALLO, Appellant, v. GRAND BAY ASSOCIATES ENTERPRISES, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5414
925 N.Y.S.2d 816

Citing Cases

Fan-Dorf Properties, Inc. v. Classic Brownstones Unlimited, LLC

Plaintiffs' evidence established that Robert Adamson never existed, was never president of Fan–Dorf, and that…

5000, Inc. v. Hudson One, Inc.

The Hudson defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on this ground…