From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dial v. Heatley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 31, 2013
2:12-cv-2569 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2013)

Opinion


RODNEY DIAL, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT HEATLEY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2569 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 31, 2013

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

         By an order filed October 31, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms and copies of his second amended complaint which are required to effect service on the defendants. On December 12, 2013, plaintiff submitted the USM-285 forms and copies but failed to fill out the address for defendant L.D. Zamora.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the USM-285 form for defendant L.D. Zamora; and

         2. Within thirty days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the completed USM-285 required to effect service. Failure to return the USM-285 form with an address for defendant Zamora within the specified time period will result in a recommendation that defendant Zamora be dismissed.


Summaries of

Dial v. Heatley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 31, 2013
2:12-cv-2569 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Dial v. Heatley

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY DIAL, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT HEATLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 31, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-2569 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2013)