Dial Industrial Sales, Inc. v. Homestead Insurance

Full title: DIAL INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.; Safe Step Reinsurance, Ltd.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 24, 2001

15 F. App'x 561 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

15 Fed.Appx. 561 (9th Cir. 2001) DIAL INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.; Safe Step Reinsurance, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE; Concord Insurance Brokerage Inc.; William H. Connolly & Co.; Lobo Claims Management Inc., Defendants-Appellants. D.C. CV-98-06350-DT. No. 00-55162. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 24, 2001

Submitted August 6, 2001. ^*

* The panel finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and WINMILL, ^** District Judge.

** The Honorable B. Lynn Winmill, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation.

ORDER ^***

*** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

We dismiss the appeal in this case for lack of jurisdiction. The "Stipulated Judgment" entered into by Dial and Connolly is not a final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (stating that parties may appeal only the "final decisions" of the district courts); Dannenberg v. Software Toolworks, Inc., 16 F.3d 1073, 1075 (9th Cir.1994) ("[T]he requirement that all claims of error be raised in a single appeal is not satisfied if there is a possibility that more than one appeal will be filed.").