From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Diakovasilis v. Bright and Sunny Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1999

October 4, 1999

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein. J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' contention that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence photographs of the sidewalk without first redacting the alleged dates of processing imprinted on the back is without merit. The photographs were properly authenticated by testimony that they fairly and accurately represented the condition of the sidewalk on the date of the accident ( see, Moore v. Leaseway Transp. Corp., 49 N.Y.2d 720).

THOMPSON, J.P., ALTMAN, FEUERSTEIN, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Diakovasilis v. Bright and Sunny Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Diakovasilis v. Bright and Sunny Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IRENE DIAKOVASILIS, et al., appellants v. BRIGHT AND SUNNY CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 220

Citing Cases

People v. Lee

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly admitted photographs of the defendant…

Pantelis v. Skanska

"The criteria for the use of photographs to show a defect [are] that they be taken reasonably close to the…