From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 1, 2000
162 N.J. 572 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

No. A-7 September Term 1999.

Argued February 1, 2000

Decided March 1, 2000.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 322 N.J. Super. 487, 731 A.2d 519 (1999).

James V. Segreto argued the cause for appellant ( Segreto Segreto, attorneys). Matthew Malfa, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for respondents ( William J. Pascrell, III, Passaic County Counsel, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 322 N.J. Super. 487, 731 A.2d 519 (1999).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O'HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO and LaVECCHIA — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 1, 2000
162 N.J. 572 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

Case Details

Full title:VILMO DI PAOLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 1, 2000

Citations

162 N.J. 572 (N.J. 2000)
745 A.2d 540

Citing Cases

Troy v. Rutgers University

Moreover, in a case involving a county adjuster whose appointment was governed by statute, we did not imply a…

Nish v. The Twp. of Morris

DiPaolo v. Passaic C'ty Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 322 N.J.Super. 487, 492 (App. Div. 1999), aff'd, 162 …